Gender differences to relative performance feedback: a field experiment in education

Cabrera, José María; Cid, Alejandro

dc.rights.license	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional	*
dc.contributor.author	Cabrera, José María
dc.contributor.author	Cid, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned	2022-07-04T19:02:10Z
dc.date.available	2022-07-04T19:02:10Z
dc.date.issued	2017	es
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1357
dc.description.abstract	Individuals care about both their absolute performance and their performance relative to others. For example, workers satisfaction is affected not only by their nominal wage but also by the comparison of their salaries relative to colleagues. We analyze the effect of providing relative performance feedback using a field experiment with university students. Untreated students misplace themselves in the grade distribution. Poor performing students over report their placement (they say that they have a better position in the classroom ranking than they actually have). On the other hand, good students (especially women) under place themselves: they report that they don’t perform as well as they actually do. We experimentally change the information that treated students have, so they know exactly how they perform relative to their peers. We find that the information feedback has asymmetric effects for men and women. Treated men report higher satisfaction with their GPA while treated women report less satisfaction, regardless of their position in the grade distribution. We also show that this non-monetary incentive caused a decrease in women academic performance. Two possible channels may explain our results: women may shy away from competition and they face an increasing marginal cost of effort. More information is not always beneficial for everybody.	es
dc.format.extent	38 p.	es
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	es
dc.language	eng	es
dc.publisher	Universidad de Montevideo, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economía, Departamento de Economía	es
dc.relation.ispartof	Documentos de trabajo del Departamento de Economía	es
dc.rights	Abierto	es
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Ranking	es
dc.subject	Field experiment	es
dc.subject	Overconfidence	es
dc.subject	Education	es
dc.title	Gender differences to relative performance feedback: a field experiment in education	es
dc.type	Documento de trabajo	es
dc.contributor.filiacion	Cabrera, José María. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay	es
dc.contributor.filiacion	Cid, Alejandro. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay	es
dc.type.version	Publicada	es

Ver ítem

Gender_Differences_to_Relative ... (1.694Mb )

license_rdf (805bytes )

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Documentos de trabajo [66]

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional